Being a Christian and relying on the Christian worldview(as much as its not a lobby in any sense, but that aside for now-) while you engage in debate is disadvantagous, not because the Christian view doesn't hold firm logic, but because of the associations that are so deeply attached to religious beliefs and standpoints. They actually might not be significant at all to what the believer believes, or are misconceptions that still hoover around even after explicit clarification. If we divorce all implications from possession of to the identity of a religious believer and just observe, arguing something while being a Christian presents one of the most difficulties and has perhaps one of the largest pitfalls of ridicule when one is defeated in terms of arguementation due to a bad manner in one's using of words to colour up your logical connections so it may serve to fit the academians circles. Academicians themselves have their differences when considering the religious believer as a subject - those that exclaim 'narrow-mindedness' are now of a lesser species once apologetics has been understood roughly, we usually get those with tolerance and psychologified understanding of one's mental inclinations and f course, there are those that go against the respect to religious beliefs totally using the logical-after-we-ponder-awhile-about-it-but-then-there-are-other-sides anti-thesis arugments to the presented rationalities of the faith, strongly reinforced by emotional rethoric. But all that aside - I shall attempt to roughly identify a few random factors of a believer's stance which turns things away from his favour.

Theological Mysteries
Amongst the several certainities we have, there are things we don't know about. Well, I guess it would not be so bad in the terms of other philosophies whereby they wouldn't be expected to have all the answers, but when a Christian explains that some things are not revealed by His creator and in his plans, the ignorance can be somehow linked to be stupidity.

'Holy' Image
While outlaws and people who bend conventions are a breath of fresh air, those that abide by the laws are naturally percieved as dogmatic and rigid (and therefore stupid?) Perhaps its the fact that it gives a 'follower' feel, that really destroys the 'leadership' and 'destiny is in my control' spirit and drive.

The world's problems
Misery, pain, suffering and blatant emotion to the big issues of the world and episodes of distress is sometimes just rethoric enough to persuade a person that the believer is insensitive and irrational and good enough to twist the arguements away from logical grounds into questionable lights.

Associations to 'god'
Someone in control of space, time and all physical and metaphysical realms to this universe indicates an accountability to Him - but that's not the image one would actually think of. Instead, there are alot of negetive images and associations, one of the floating around ones which aren't exactly justified by anything. For instance, one such idea roughly held by the 'religion is a crutch' people is that God is some conception of the mind and only for the weak-willed who can't live their lives without a handle of some sort to grasp. While people might not have the belief in their belief systems, the lingering academic presence of that conception is kinda like a tapped mana card that hints strongly, thus giving bad associations to Christian arguements even before the logic is tested.

Evangelical nature of Christianity
We share because we believe that it is true, of course without intentions of imposing although some may get zealous to that extent. But this act would offend the um, (no offense, lol!) weak-minded - either 1) afraid of the beliefs, 2) affected by the sharing or 3) insulted by the sharing, which is not exactly logical justified since the same person would probaly be amused if you tried to convince him the easter bunny existed and lived in Alaska, or apathetic/intellectually sitmulated if you wanted to give your reasons for the belief of how some war in history started. And well, maybe they could whine a little about it if they don't like the fact that information which they assume they don't care about is presented to them - sometimes, people do whine when we tell them excitedly about this doctor who found the cure to a dieasese since they're not that interested in that dieasese or bothered if they have it or not.

The people associated to us
Especially when we have a image that professes a lot, it just takes a few people who claim to be of Christian beliefs to do certain actions that make everyone seem bad. It would be reinforced by the fact that christians are supposed to be part of a community.


I didn't give a counter to every point up there - not because it can't be done, but rather because I don't think I need to -_- There are the valid points of arguements agaisnt the faith which can be taken and discussed so that we, as equal humans can try to climb over the big questions that existence throws at us together with the evidence we have at hand and the logic we can generate. Mankind should be more intelligent than using the impressions to judge no matter what the subject matter is and even if we don't want to bother about the burning house because sleeping is good for health, we should still find out if fire hurts us.

Labels: Religion

---

_Past

June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

---