Freedom implies control. Control demands decesions. Decesions instigate blunders. Blunders create unrest. And urest, begets the yell for freedom.

Liberty might not be a clear indicator of what freedom is about. It never may be a word that was designed to gague 'free'. Perhaps it was only with slight association and gusto that the word linked up in wedding with freedom. Liberty enhances its scope with a stronger feel, a more powerful thrust to the subject in case. But still, liberation does not mean freedom. Nor does freedom equate to liberation. Liberation seemingly would allow freedom; and while this is in dependence of the subject invovling the freeing and liberating, its aura is not a nature of free. Within the field of termiologies and thus the definative decesion, freedom compasses speech, action, thought and other tangibles that are friendly with the groupage. Liberty takes on an 'act of being free', where someone is 'at liberty' to perform something, he would be allowed to undergo the process within the superficial bounaries that the instruction/rule has allowed of him/restricted him under. Yet all such terms only grasp onto the surface of being free and liberated. A fine line still blurs itself upon both concepts and in simplicity, they do agree with each other. With respect to consequence and result from action and process.

Why do people want to be free? Following the angle of the first paragraph, the control would require something that is pretty lagged upon individuals and groups. (not to mention the conflict that occurs within each) -- direction. What to follow? Systems set-up have spurred up followers, but beside the ideas, it might be the something else that attracts. The hunger perhaps. The sense of well-being(delusion) perhaps. All these, in orbital of the quest of being free. To those who are still within O level history influence, take note that this also refers obvious and implict scenarios of the modern contriditctions, the debatable dinosaurs and the lost and confused. To be free- one must break away. And that means something must be shattered. An order must be broken to restore the rightful order that is desired by you. A purpose is created for the necessity of designing a suitable want for you. To break away from the rest maybe. To go against the others, perhaps. To not be bounded, while still sercured. To not be trapped, while still within.

However, the call for liberty does not soley sit on the stones that names its distress. And while the quest is undertaken, the question of liberty remains but a vague mystery. On the surface, it might make perfect sense. And into it, it might have meaning. But when that is broken up and taken apart, and when a step back demonstrates the wonder of what the liberty is about... What exactly is the freedom for? And what is this freedom about? And what does it actually mean?

Liberty is not always liberty. Freedom doesn't always give freedom. Be it an official announcement, a implict affirmation, a advice-like agreement... for freedom's sake, and to liberty's injustice..

No one is free. In many ways, in several instances..

Its not much of a question of how much we are allowed to. Its a question of how much we can.

And can't.

---

_Past

June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

---