web hit counter
Archives | Contact | Profile | Unneeded Theory

Friday, March 25, 2005
Choice between Two

Life seems to be something thats very colourful. It seems to be a process thats exciting and vibrant, scary and yet enjoyable. The underlying battles that the warriors do are from the swung of blades to the stabbing of swords, the wandering that the wanderers go through are from the runs to the jumps. In the journey, there would be mists and fogs. There would be darkness and blinding. There would be the poisions, the traps, the pitfalls, the treasures... the goals.

And then we die.


The thing about 'two'... that everything holds towards this law of 'two', doesn't seem to appear appealing to humans anymore. Cultures speculate, creatures regulate, and in the end, a conclusion is something that is needed, desired and expected, although most of the time, its not... there.
But its only seemingly logical for people to think that way. When someone goes... "There are only two types of ___ in the world, ........" one would assume that to be a generalised and exaggerated opinion, or perhaps a view that gives the ultima on the topic. But they say: there must be the exceptions. There must be the grey matter. No one believes that theres a black and white anymore. Because of the intricates... the details. We were made to generalise and than specialise. We are insisted upon to 'learn more and more about something less and less'. But I shan't digress.

Its folly to think that there are only two types of people in the world, the controllers and the controlled? One jests if he comments that there are only two types of states in the world, a free state and a non-free state? It is a moronic conclusion to state that there are only two types of humans in this earth, the rich and the poor?

Perhaps. It has become werid for us to just label something so clear-cuttly and define the boundaries with only 1 line to draw in division. However, we should realise that there are the things that are so clear cut. Many things. Peace or Chaos. Pass or Fail. Man or Woman. Heaven or Hell. Life or Death. Yeah, many will argue again that these are still only ultimas. But in actuality, life isn't so simple.

Life now, appears like a buffet. There are plenty of choices to plenty of things. Many decesions to many ideas. But as much as the platter seems to attract, and as much as the deeds seem correct, logic is sometimes not vital to be equalised to reason, or for that case, Truth. Humans enjoy being so abstractly corrupted within the nature of an allness-oneness principle that strongly forbids the law of 2.

But why? A simple test that can be used to test the same roots of fanatisim: Sincerely believing in something will not make it true. No more will building a solid belief framework and dome that fits jigsaws of the world together nicely.
As much as we want to believe that there are many ways for things to happen and that there are many ways for occurances to occur, the law of 2 still applys. And the fact that it is a ultima should never be scaled down. Theres always two paths to choose. Two roads to walk. Two choices to decide on.
Why let the intricates let you down? Why let the grey matter fog your view? As much as you want to argue the complications of the maze, the end would be always existant: either path A or path B. You have to choose and decide.

But humans don't seem to like to choose and decide. The cave seems warm enough for them to stay in and just agree that theres the allness in everything. Shows like '0', on channel U have even brought across concept that there is an in-between. People nowadys like being 'neutral'. They like to get stuck in the holes, rather than make up their mind to commit to something.

Seriously, why? Because its nice? Because its cool? Because its seemingly great to feel that you are the middle, the one that can transcend through both lights and agree through both waters? What is so great about being in that abyss? To linger so certainly/uncertainly in the illusion you have deemed as reality? Is it enjoyable to be so very clear about this whole picture? Is it even logical to find yourself comfortable in this state of in-between?
I won't insist futher. But rather, it would be sensible to observe what the idea of 'wholeness' really brings about. Like art, to each his own.

Because, we either live. Or die. A gunshot in the night can only mean two things - The start of a race, or the end of a life.

---
God sent his son, Jesus by grace. Jesus died on the Cross and was Raised again. He died for mankind. He was the sacrifice for our Sins. How numb do you feel to this statement? How sick do you get when you have someone reasoning to you about this?

Ask yourself. Look for the answers. Search for the truth. And then decide.
Give it chance. Besides theres only two ways to dealing with truth......

Which.



_Past

June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009


maystar * designs