How deep a subject is, how abstract something can be, how many reactions it should spark: Based on thoughts, based on circumstance, based on influecnce; corrupted with pressure, tainted with unease, shrouded with denail... depends.

On everything. Variably, the ones who think are the ones that get the full blow of this considerment of immersion. To decide between whether is it a cage or a reserve. To distinguish between a trek over zealous enthusiasm and a run.

The process is foggy. Words don't do much justice. The assumpsions and literative conclusions are sometime debative and not even towards relevance or expectance of the variable. How deep is it? How far down can you go? What measures should you take? What conditions should it be? How can you manage the depth.... and still run?

Reactions don't care about the answers and the answers don't care about the details. Nothing much is given to the process, the collection. The throw out. The carvings.

To decide. To makeshift. To analyse. To debate. To retrospect.

When its not about knowledge. Not about proving. Not about explanations. Nor definations. Nor confusions. Nor decesions.

Because.

---

_Past

June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

---